A Note on Bell’s Theorem Logical Consistency

Counterfactual definiteness is supposed to underlie the Bell theorem. An old controversy exists among those who reject theorem implications by rejecting counterfactual and claim that, since it a direct consequence of locality, cannot be independently rejected. We propose different approach for solving this contentious issue realizing that an unnecessary inconsistent assumption. not equivalent realism or determinism neither follows from locality. It merely reduces incongruent application reasoning. Being incompatible with falsifiability, constitutes unjustified assumption goes against scientific method's rigor. Correct formulations theorem's bases show absent either as fundamental hypothesis something else. Most importantly, we present coherent inequality derivation carefully devised explicitly convincingly absence experiments Thus, even admitting could consistent assumption, necessary conclusion irrelevant formulation can safely ignored when discussing Bell's philosophical physical implications.